HYBRID EVENT: You can participate in person at Orlando, Florida, USA or Virtually from your home or work.

3rd Edition of Global Conference on Gynecology & Women's Health

October 27-29, 2025 | Orlando, Florida, USA

October 27 -29, 2025 | Orlando, Florida, USA
Gynec 2025

Comparing the efficacy of levonorgestrel intrauterine device and oral levonorgestrel for emergency contraception: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Speaker at Womens Health Conference - Andie Blankenstein
Central Michigan University, United States
Title : Comparing the efficacy of levonorgestrel intrauterine device and oral levonorgestrel for emergency contraception: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Abstract:

Background: Emergency contraception (EC) is critical for preventing unintended pregnancies following unprotected or inadequately protected sexual intercourse. While oral levonorgestrel (LNG) pills are the standard FDA-approved EC method, the levonorgestrel intrauterine device (LNG-IUD) is emerging as an alternative, offering both immediate EC and long-term contraception benefits. This study evaluates the efficacy of LNG-IUD compared to oral-LNG for EC.

Methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted following PRISMA 2020 guidelines. PubMed, Scopus, and Medline were searched up to December 16, 2024, using keywords related to postcoital contraception, levonorgestrel, and intrauterine devices. Five studies from two countries, totaling 920 participants, met the population, intervention, comparison, outcome, and settings (PICOS) criteria focusing on women of reproductive age using LNG-IUD or oral LND as EC. Risk of bias was assessed using the mixed methods appraisal tool (MMAT), and a random-effects model was applied due to significant heterogeneity.

Results: The LNG-IUD, when indirectly compared to oral LNG for EC, demonstrated a natural log of the odds risk ratio (ORR) of –0.51 (95% CI: -3.86-2.83, p=0.77), suggesting a lower risk of pregnancy with the LNG-IUD. However, the wide confidence interval and lack of statistical significance, as reflected by the high p value, likely results from limited studies available for this dataset.

Conclusion: This review found no statistically significant difference in efficacy between LNG-IUD and oral-LNG for emergency contraception, likely due to wide confidence intervals and limited data, supporting LNG-IUD as an alternative. LNG-IUD offers comparable efficacy to other EC options and the added benefit of long-term contraception, underscoring the importance of additional direct studies to expand emergency contraception options for women.

Biography:

Andie Blankenstein is a dedicated second-year medical student at Central Michigan University College of Medicine. She earned a Bachelor of Science in Chemistry with a concentration in Medicinal Chemistry and Drug Discovery from Wake Forest University in 2021, followed by a Master of Science in Bioethics from Columbia University in 2022. She is very passionate about Women’s Health and committed to advancing research in this field to improve patient care and outcomes.

Watsapp